The U.S. General Services Administration (GSA) uses a classification system to rate security window films based on the GSA-TS-1-2003 test method. This system measures a glazing system’s ability to contain glass fragments and maintain structural integrity when subjected to an external explosive charge at a 50-meter standoff distance.
The four GSA levels of protection are defined as follows:
- Level 1 (Minimum Protection): Tested against 2.3 kg of TNT. The glass may break, but the film retains fragments and prevents perforation of the glazing. This is typically used for low-risk interior partitions.
- Level 2 (Moderate Protection): Tested against 4.5 kg of TNT. The glazing remains in the frame; while some glass breakage is allowed, the film must prevent major fragmentation. Common applications include office buildings and reception areas.
- Level 3 (High Protection): Tested against 9.1 kg of TNT. The glass may break, but the film retains all fragments and no significant opening is formed. This level is used for government facilities, schools, and high-value commercial buildings.
- Level 4 (Very High Protection): Tested against 13.6 kg of TNT. The glazing remains in the frame and the film retains all fragments with very limited structural breach. This is intended for embassies, critical infrastructure, and military facilities.
Note that these levels represent blast mitigation performance, not ballistic protection. Security window film is NOT bullet-resistant.
Related FAQs
-
How does Film Thickness Affect the Cost per Square Foot?
Read More »: How does Film Thickness Affect the Cost per Square Foot?Film thickness is a primary driver of the cost per square foot because heavier gauge films require more raw material, more sophisticated manufacturing processes (such as multi-layer lamination), and specialized handling during installation. As the thickness of the film increases,…
-
How Often should a Business Perform a Physical Security Site Survey?
Read More »: How Often should a Business Perform a Physical Security Site Survey?For organizations seeking to maintain a robust security posture, a physical security site assessment should not be treated as a one-time event. According to the guidelines provided by Amarok Defense, a business should perform a full reassessment of its facility…
-
Is Blast Mitigation Film More Expensive than Standard Security Film?
Read More »: Is Blast Mitigation Film More Expensive than Standard Security Film?Yes, blast mitigation film is significantly more expensive than standard security film. According to industry pricing benchmarks for 2026, blast mitigation film is considered a high-end, premium product with a budget impact approximately 2–3 times higher than baseline security films.…
-
What are the Labor Rates for Professional Window Film Installation?
Read More »: What are the Labor Rates for Professional Window Film Installation?Professional labor rates for security window film installation are influenced by the complexity of the project, geographic location, and specific window characteristics. Based on 2026 benchmarks for the Southwest U.S. (including Arizona), labor costs generally fall into the following categories:…
-
What Common Window Vulnerabilities are Found During Security Assessments?
Read More »: What Common Window Vulnerabilities are Found During Security Assessments?During security assessments, experts frequently identify several critical weaknesses in window assemblies that can lead to unauthorized access or injury. Common vulnerabilities include: Lack of Protective Film: Many facilities have ground-floor windows that lack security or anti-shatter film, leaving them…