The ASTM F3561 standard measures time-based resistance by evaluating how long a complete glazing assembly—including the frame, glass, and security film—can deny an attacker physical access under a sustained assault. Unlike earlier standards that relied on static loads, ASTM F3561 uses a dynamic, three-phase sequence to simulate real-world attacks.
The Testing Sequence
The protocol follows a structured progression to test the assembly’s durability:
- Initial Impacts: A calibrated pendulum device delivers a specific number of strikes to weaken the glass, simulating an attacker hitting the surface with a heavy object.
- Tool Application: Immediately following the impacts, technicians apply primary tools (such as screwdrivers, pry bars, or hammers) directly to the damaged area to attempt a breach.
- Timed Resistance window: The resistance is measured in seconds. If a tool fully penetrates the assembly before the time limit for a specific level is reached, the system fails. If it denies penetration for the full duration, it passes.
Performance Levels (1–4)
Resistance is classified into levels based on the duration of the attack and the tools used:
- Level 1: 60 seconds of resistance against a screwdriver and pry bar (5 impacts).
- Level 2: 120 seconds of resistance, adding a hammer to the toolkit (7 impacts).
- Level 3: 180 seconds of resistance, including use of a sledgehammer (10 impacts).
- Level 4: 300 seconds (5 minutes) of resistance against power tools and all lower-level implements (15 impacts).
To achieve higher levels, such as Level 3, security films are typically paired with impact protection attachment systems (like wet glaze or mechanical anchoring) to prevent the entire filmed panel from being pushed out of the frame.
Related FAQs
-
How does Film Thickness Affect the Cost per Square Foot?
Read More »: How does Film Thickness Affect the Cost per Square Foot?Film thickness is a primary driver of the cost per square foot because heavier gauge films require more raw material, more sophisticated manufacturing processes (such as multi-layer lamination), and specialized handling during installation. As the thickness of the film increases,…
-
How Often should a Business Perform a Physical Security Site Survey?
Read More »: How Often should a Business Perform a Physical Security Site Survey?For organizations seeking to maintain a robust security posture, a physical security site assessment should not be treated as a one-time event. According to the guidelines provided by Amarok Defense, a business should perform a full reassessment of its facility…
-
Is Blast Mitigation Film More Expensive than Standard Security Film?
Read More »: Is Blast Mitigation Film More Expensive than Standard Security Film?Yes, blast mitigation film is significantly more expensive than standard security film. According to industry pricing benchmarks for 2026, blast mitigation film is considered a high-end, premium product with a budget impact approximately 2–3 times higher than baseline security films.…
-
What are the Labor Rates for Professional Window Film Installation?
Read More »: What are the Labor Rates for Professional Window Film Installation?Professional labor rates for security window film installation are influenced by the complexity of the project, geographic location, and specific window characteristics. Based on 2026 benchmarks for the Southwest U.S. (including Arizona), labor costs generally fall into the following categories:…
-
What Common Window Vulnerabilities are Found During Security Assessments?
Read More »: What Common Window Vulnerabilities are Found During Security Assessments?During security assessments, experts frequently identify several critical weaknesses in window assemblies that can lead to unauthorized access or injury. Common vulnerabilities include: Lack of Protective Film: Many facilities have ground-floor windows that lack security or anti-shatter film, leaving them…